miraeproof tracks the readiness of every upcoming visit across your studies, so you can allocate your attention to what needs you first.
Waits a day before treating sponsor data as missing.
Approved by the site's lead coordinator, Aug 2Asks for infusion confirmation by Friday noon.
Waiting for reviewSynthetic data. Ebin Systems is a made-up clinic system standing in for the ones your site already uses. Select any part of the strip to open it.
Take one infusion visit. The protocol sets the dates it's allowed to happen. eConsent knows which consent version the participant signed. The chair scheduler knows whether a chair is booked, and the sponsor portal carries the latest amendment.
Each system is right about its own piece. The whole visit is held together by a coordinator, in a spreadsheet and in their working memory. That holds up until the week gets busy, or until that coordinator moves on.
Sorted by no-show risk, P042 would come first. miraeproof ranks P052 ahead of it because its problems stop being fixable in two days, and the row says so.
Open any item and follow it back to the records behind it. Here is P052.
Step through this trace in the demo
An amendment recompiles the protocol, and every obligation is re-proved from what its source holds now. Nothing carries over from the old version. P077's consent passed under version 1.0 and needs review under 2.0.
The protocol decides what may be read, and interpretation follows fixed rules. Before anything runs, a site can show exactly which fields miraeproof reads and what leaves.
miraeproof docks to the edge of your screen, next to your records and scheduling systems from any vendor. It holds back everything splitting your attention and unfolds for what needs you now.
It's built for the teams who run visits at research sites. The site decides what it may read and approves anything it learns, and your team still does the work in its own systems.
miraeproof keeps the evidence and adds the outcome while patient records stay in the site's own systems. As miraeproof sees more visits it learns how a site operates and relies less on reference data.
When miraeproof notices a pattern, such as a sponsor portal that always runs a day late, it proposes a change. Nothing changes until someone at the site approves it.
Clinical research professionals stay in a role for about 1.5 to 2 years. In a 2022 open letter, SCRS reported annual turnover of 35% to 61% among patient-facing site staff. Someone new to the team starts with the history their predecessors built.
Sources: SCRS, Fixing the Foundations (2025); SCRS, open letter on workforce retention (2022).
Waits a day before treating sponsor data as missing.
Approved by the site's lead coordinator, Aug 2Asks for infusion confirmation by Friday noon.
Waiting for reviewmiraeproof is in the early stages of rollout. The core is built and tested, and every number on this site and in the demo comes from one synthetic dataset.
Retrospective validation is open to research sites now. Email us and we'll walk your team through the demo, then ask how you track visits today.
If you build protocol tooling, or turn free-text records into structured facts, we'll show you how the evidence exchange works and where your work could plug in.
Email donovan@miraeproof.com